Instead of the radical solution presented above, we should act on a case-by-case basis. On the other hand, a pulsing icon trying to notify the user of a new feature that they might not be interested in seems to be an animation that could or should be removed. When the user clicks a submit button but the form cannot be submitted because one field is not filled, it may be a good idea to draw attention to that field by, say, animating a box shadow. ![]() I want the text to be fixed without rotation. The thing is when I try to add the text inside it, it inherit the motion of the inner circle which I don't need. It is totally fine to keep some animations, especially when induced by a user action. I'm trying to do this animated circle application with a text inside it. For each animation we can ask ourselves (or even better: our users) whether it adds to the user experience or is just a fancy but unnecessary effect. The media query is called prefers-reduced-motion, not prefers-no-motion nor does-absolutely-not-want-any-motion. Removing them entirely may not be a good idea. Removing animations or reducing animations?Īs said before, animations can improve the user experience. The Mozilla Developer Network has a list of how to activate this setting on various operating systems. In general, this is not a browser setting but a setting that you can activate on your device. Therefore, we do not want to remove animations in general but only for those users that prefer reduced motion.Īnd we can do exactly that with a media query called prefers-reduced-motion: (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) How to activate the reduced motion setting They can make a fine website a great one. However, animations are a good thing, as they can help the user processing the contents of a website better.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |